A client I worked with named Claire ran a fintech startup in Edinburgh. Her development team had spent four months building a small business invoicing tool with an unusual feature: it automatically flagged clients with a pattern of late payment before the invoice was even overdue, based on historical payment behavior analysis. Genuinely useful and genuinely original.
She wrote a press release about it herself. She was proud of it and, reading it from a founder's perspective, it was completely understandable why. It described the product in detail, explained every feature, quoted herself on how excited the team was about the launch, and finished with the company's founding story and mission statement.
She sent it to 40 journalists using a contact list she had built over several months. Two journalists replied. Neither covered the story. She got zero backlinks and one polite email explaining that the outlet did not cover product launches from startups without a significant funding announcement attached.
If you want expert help with this, explore our Press Release Links — we work with service businesses across the UK, Dubai, and UAE.
When she brought me in to look at it, the problem was clear within the first paragraph. The press release was written for her investors, not for journalists. It answered every question a potential customer might have about the product and almost none of the questions a journalist would need answered to justify covering it.
We rewrote it together around a single news angle: UK small businesses lost an estimated 56 billion pounds in 2023 due to late payments, and her tool was the first automated early warning system designed specifically to address that problem before it occurred. That angle had a data hook, a named problem with public significance, a clear and specific solution, and a direct relevance to any journalist covering UK business, finance, or entrepreneurship.
The rewritten release went to 22 carefully selected journalists. Eight covered the story. Her company earned backlinks from the Financial Times SME section, Forbes UK, three regional business publications, two fintech industry newsletters, and a BBC Radio Scotland interview that produced a mention on the station's website. Thirteen backlinks from a single press release, all from genuinely authoritative publications.
This guide covers exactly what the difference was between those two press releases and how to write the version that gets covered.
Why Most Press Releases Never Get Covered by Anyone
The core misunderstanding behind most ineffective press releases is a confusion about whose interests the document is supposed to serve. Business owners write press releases to announce things that matter to them. Journalists cover stories that matter to their readers. Those two sets of interests overlap far less often than most business owners assume, and every press release that fails to bridge that gap ends up deleted without a reply.
Journalists at regional and national publications receive dozens to hundreds of press release submissions every week depending on the beat they cover. They are not looking for reasons to cover your announcement. They are looking for reasons not to, because covering a story requires time, editorial judgment, and space that could go to something their editor and readers genuinely care about.
A press release that leads with your company name, your excitement about your launch, and a detailed description of your product's features is asking a journalist to do significant interpretive work to find the story within your announcement. Most of them will not do that work. They will move to the next email.
A press release that leads with a newsworthy angle, a data point that reveals something significant, a trend that your announcement exemplifies, or a problem of genuine public relevance that your story addresses is handing the journalist a story they can already see. The structure of the article is implied by the press release itself. That is the difference between a release that gets covered and one that gets deleted.
The Anatomy of a Press Release That Earns Editorial Backlinks
Before writing a single word, the most important work in creating an effective press release is identifying the angle that makes your announcement newsworthy to people who have no prior interest in your company. Every other element of the press release serves this angle. If the angle is weak, no amount of polished writing will compensate for it.
A strong press release angle has one or more of the following characteristics. It contains original data that reveals something surprising, counterintuitive, or previously undocumented about a topic of genuine public interest. It connects your announcement to a trend that journalists are already covering and provides a new example or data point that advances their understanding of that trend. It represents a genuine first, whether the first company in your sector to do something, the first product to solve a specific problem in a specific way, or the first documented case of an outcome that others in your industry will recognize as significant. Or it addresses a problem of direct relevance to a clearly defined audience that the publication serves, framed around the readers rather than around your company.
Claire's original press release had none of these characteristics. Her rewritten release had three of them. It contained original data about the scale of the late payment problem, it connected her product to a trend journalists covering UK small business were already writing about regularly, and it positioned her tool as the first automated early warning system in its category. Three genuine news hooks in a single announcement.
Writing the Headline That Decides Whether Your Release Gets Read
Journalists make their decision about whether a press release is worth reading within the first four seconds of seeing it. The headline is the entire first impression. A headline that reads like an internal company announcement will never produce coverage. A headline that reads like the opening of a news story will at least earn the first paragraph a chance.
The most common headline mistake in business press releases is leading with the company name. Your company name means nothing to a journalist who has never covered you. It tells them nothing about whether your story is worth their time. A headline structured as "[Company Name] Launches [Product Name]" is the journalistic equivalent of a cold call that opens with "My name is Claire and I have something I would like to tell you about."
An effective press release headline should read like a news headline, because that is exactly what you are hoping a journalist will turn it into. It should state the newsworthy fact, not describe the announcement. Compare these two approaches for the same story: "EdinPay Launches SmartInvoice Late Payment Early Warning Tool" versus "UK Small Businesses Lost 56 Billion Pounds to Late Payments Last Year. A New Tool Aims to Stop It Before It Starts." The second headline is the one a journalist forwards to their editor. The first one is the one they delete.
Keep your headline under 15 words where possible. Use active voice. Lead with the data point, the problem, or the genuinely newsworthy claim rather than your company name. Your company name belongs in the first body paragraph, not in the headline.
Structuring the Body to Make a Journalist's Job as Easy as Possible
Journalists are not resistant to covering good stories. They are resistant to stories that require significant effort to understand, verify, and write. A press release that does the structural work of a news article for the journalist makes their decision to cover it substantially easier.
Your opening paragraph, called the lede in journalism, should contain the most newsworthy element of your announcement in no more than two sentences. Everything that matters most about why this story is worth covering should be present in those two sentences. A journalist who reads only your lede and nothing else should be able to decide whether the story is relevant to their audience.
The second paragraph expands on the lede with supporting context. If your lede contains a data point, the second paragraph explains where that data came from and why it matters. If your lede describes a problem, the second paragraph quantifies the scale of that problem with specific evidence.
The third paragraph is where your company and your product or announcement appear explicitly. By this point in the press release, the journalist understands why they should care about the context. Now you are explaining who you are, what you have built or done, and how it addresses the problem or situation you introduced in the opening.
Include one strong, quotable quote from your CEO or a relevant spokesperson. Journalists frequently use direct quotes from press releases when they cover stories, which is why the quote matters for both coverage quality and for your eventual backlink anchor text context. The quote should say something genuinely interesting about the significance of the announcement rather than repeating information already in the body text. A quote that says "We are thrilled to launch this product" is useless. A quote that says "Late payment has been destroying small business cash flow for decades. We built this to change the dynamic entirely by giving businesses foresight instead of hindsight" is quotable because it contains a clear position and a memorable framing.
Close with a boilerplate section, sometimes called the About section, containing your company name, founding year, description, and website URL with a full hyperlink. This is where the backlink in your press release lives. Journalists and editors who use your release to inform their coverage will frequently include this boilerplate information or reference it when linking to your company.
The Data Hook That Transforms a Routine Announcement Into a Coverable Story
If there is a single element that separates press releases that earn meaningful editorial coverage from those that earn none, it is original data. Journalists can cover your product launch as a feature story, but they can almost always cover original research as a news story. News stories get published faster, placed more prominently, and shared more widely than feature coverage. They also generate more backlinks because more publications reference data from the same source.
Original data in a press release does not require a professional research firm or a significant budget. It requires methodology and honesty about sample size and scope. A survey of 500 customers about their experiences with a specific problem your product solves is original data. An analysis of publicly available data about a trend in your industry is original data. A study of your platform's internal data that reveals a pattern of genuine interest to your industry is original data, as long as you are transparent about the source and methodology.
The data should be genuinely surprising or reveal something that contradicts assumptions your target audience holds. Confirming what everyone already believes is not news. Data that reveals a gap between perception and reality, a problem that is larger or more common than people think, or a trend moving in an unexpected direction gives journalists something genuinely worth reporting.
When Claire's team ran a quick survey of 400 UK small business owners about their late payment experiences, they discovered that 73% had experienced a client who eventually defaulted on a significant invoice but had shown payment delays on smaller invoices in the preceding six months. That pattern, which their tool was specifically designed to detect, was the data that made their story genuinely newsworthy. The product was interesting. The data made it a news story.
Targeting the Right Journalists Instead of Blasting a Generic List
The distribution strategy for a press release matters as much as the content itself. Sending a perfectly crafted press release to the wrong journalists produces the same result as sending a poor press release to the right ones. Neither gets covered.
The most common distribution mistake is using a spray-and-pray approach through paid press release wire services like PR Newswire or Business Wire and expecting editorial backlinks to result. Wire distribution produces syndicated copies of your release across hundreds of low-authority news aggregator sites that republish wire content automatically. Those links are typically nofollow, come from sites Google does not evaluate as genuine editorial sources, and provide almost no ranking benefit. Wire services have their place for investor relations and official announcements but they are not an editorial link building strategy.
Genuine editorial backlinks from news sites require targeted outreach to individual journalists who cover your specific beat. The process of identifying those journalists starts with reading the publications you want coverage in and noting which writers cover the topics most relevant to your announcement. Tools like Muckrack, Roxhill, and Cision maintain journalist databases with beat information, recent articles, and contact details. For regional coverage, manually searching publication archives for recent articles on related topics and identifying the bylined reporters is often faster and more accurate than database tools.
Personalise every outreach email beyond just inserting the journalist's name. Reference a specific recent article they wrote that relates to your story. Explain in one sentence why your announcement is relevant to the audience they write for. Attach the press release as a plain text document rather than a formatted PDF, which many journalists find harder to work with when extracting quotes and information.
Claire's second campaign reached 22 journalists specifically because each one had demonstrably covered small business finance, late payment issues, or fintech innovation in the preceding three months. The eight who covered the story did so because the angle was immediately relevant to what they were already writing about.
Timing Your Release to Maximize Coverage Probability
When you send a press release influences whether it gets covered almost as much as what it contains. Journalists work to publication schedules and editorial calendars that have natural windows of higher receptivity and periods when even good pitches get buried.
Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday mornings between 8am and 10am in the journalist's time zone consistently produce the highest open and response rates for press release outreach. Monday mornings are consumed by catching up on the weekend and planning the week. Friday afternoons produce low engagement because journalists are closing out their week rather than starting new stories. Avoid sending releases on major public holidays or during periods when significant breaking news is dominating your target publications.
Tying your release to a relevant news hook already in the cycle increases coverage probability significantly. If the government has just released a report on small business challenges and your announcement addresses one of those challenges directly, sending your release within 48 hours of that report's publication positions your story as a timely response to something already in the news cycle rather than a standalone announcement competing for space on its own merits.
Embargoed releases, where you share the full release with journalists before the publication date and ask them not to publish until a specified time, are worth considering for announcements with strong news angles. Embargo arrangements give journalists time to develop a more complete story, interview additional sources, and prepare more substantial coverage. The articles that result are typically longer, more prominently placed, and more likely to include a direct link to your company than pieces written from a same-day pitch.
Common Press Release Mistakes That Kill Coverage Before It Starts
Using excessive marketing language and superlatives throughout the body text signals to journalists that the release was written by a marketer rather than someone thinking about editorial value. Words like revolutionary, innovative, groundbreaking, and industry-leading appear in thousands of press releases every week and communicate nothing meaningful to a journalist evaluating newsworthiness.
Including too many quotes from too many people dilutes the impact of each one. One strong, genuinely quotable statement from a credible spokesperson is more valuable than four bland quotes from four different executives that each repeat information already in the body text.
Burying the news angle deep in the release is one of the most common structural mistakes. Founders often want to build context before revealing the headline announcement, following a logical progression that feels natural from an internal perspective. Journalists read in reverse. They want the most important information first and context second. If your strongest news element appears in paragraph four, most journalists will never reach it.
Failing to include a clear contact for follow-up questions leaves interested journalists without a path to the additional information they need to complete a story. Every press release should include a named media contact with a direct phone number and email address that goes to someone who can respond within two hours during business hours.
Frequently Asked Questions
Wire services produce wide syndication of your release across news aggregator sites that republish wire content automatically. The links from these syndicated copies are almost universally nofollow and come from sites Google treats as low-authority aggregators rather than genuine editorial sources. Wire distribution serves legitimate purposes for investor relations, official corporate announcements, and reaching a broad audience quickly, but it is not an effective strategy for earning the genuine editorial backlinks that improve organic search rankings. Target individual journalists directly for editorial coverage.
Between 400 and 600 words is the ideal range for most press releases targeting editorial coverage. This length is sufficient to communicate the news angle, provide supporting context, include a strong quote, and deliver the essential company information without padding. Releases under 300 words often lack sufficient context for journalists to write a full story from. Releases over 800 words typically contain content that belongs in a fact sheet or supplementary document rather than in the release itself.
One follow-up email sent three to five days after the initial release is appropriate and often productive. Keep it brief, refer to the original release, and add one new element if possible, an additional data point, a development in the story, or a connection to something that has happened in the news cycle since your initial send. Multiple follow-ups beyond one are rarely productive and risk damaging your relationship with journalists you may want to pitch again in the future.
Yes, particularly through regional and local media where the bar for coverage is lower and the competitive pitch volume is significantly less than at national outlets. A local business announcement that would be ignored by a national publication can earn genuine editorial coverage from a regional business journal, a local newspaper's business section, or a city-focused online publication. Local media backlinks carry meaningful geographic relevance signals for local SEO and provide a foundation for building toward national coverage as your story develops.
Apply the reader test. Ask yourself whether a reader of your target publication who has no prior knowledge of your company would find this announcement interesting, useful, or surprising based solely on its relevance to their life or work. If the honest answer requires qualifying conditions like "well, if they understand our industry" or "if they have experienced this problem personally," your angle probably needs to be broadened or reframed. If the answer is a straightforward yes based on a genuine data point, a clear human impact, or a documented first in your category, you have a newsworthy angle worth pitching.
The Story That Was Always There
Claire's product did not change between the first press release that earned zero coverage and the second that earned thirteen backlinks from authoritative publications. The facts were identical. The announcement was the same. What changed was the frame around those facts and the clarity with which the release communicated why those facts mattered to people who had never heard of her company.
Most businesses with genuinely interesting things to announce are sitting on stories that journalists would cover if those stories were presented in the right frame. The product launch buried in marketing language becomes a story about a problem affecting millions of people when the data hook is surfaced and the audience impact is made explicit. The company milestone described in internal terms becomes a trend story when connected to the broader pattern it exemplifies.
Finding that frame is the real skill in press release writing. The tactics in this guide give you the structural tools to express it once you have found it. But the starting point is always the same question: why would a reader of this publication who has never heard of my company care about this announcement? The answer to that question is your press release.
Have you written press releases before that did not produce the coverage you expected? Share what your experience looked like and what you think the angle was missing. Let's talk through how to reframe it.
Want Results Like This for Your Business?
Get a free Local SEO audit — we will show you exactly what is holding your rankings back and the fastest path to the Google map pack.
Talk to a Local SEO Specialist →